Doxxing
Disclosing personal information about someone without their consent in circumstances that expose them to a risk. It may identify or locate a person, or make it easier for others to target them.
Privacy · Online safety · French law
Understand the differences between doxxing, cyberbullying and online harassment, how these situations can overlap and which French legal rules may apply.
These expressions are sometimes used interchangeably, but they describe different things: disclosing someone's personal information, repeatedly targeting someone through digital tools, or engaging in harassment on the internet.
Disclosing personal information about someone without their consent in circumstances that expose them to a risk. It may identify or locate a person, or make it easier for others to target them.
Malicious conduct carried out through online services or digital devices. Repetition may come from one person or from several people acting successively as a group.
A broader everyday expression for harassment carried out online, including through social networks, messaging services, forums, gaming platforms and email.
Doxxing (also spelled doxing) generally means finding, compiling or publishing information that can identify or locate a person, sometimes linking their offline identity to their online activity. Examples include a person's name, photographs, home address, phone number, workplace or information about relatives.
The French official terminology uses divulgation malveillante d'informations personnelles (malicious disclosure of personal information). The official definition refers to the disclosure, without the person's consent, of personal information about them that exposes them to a risk.
Doxxing can happen in a single post. It does not require a series of posts to be described as doxxing in everyday usage. Whether a criminal offence has been committed depends on the specific facts and the legal requirements that apply.
Cyberbullying is a form of harassment carried out through digital tools. It can include insults, threats, mockery, rumours, humiliating messages, repeated posts or coordinated attacks.
Repeated conduct may come from one person. It may also result from several people taking successive turns targeting the same victim. In that group situation, each participant does not necessarily have to act repeatedly for the overall conduct to be examined under the French offence of harassment.
Under French criminal law, Article 222-33-2-2 of the Criminal Code covers, among other things, repeated words or behaviour that have the purpose or effect of degrading a person's living conditions and causing an alteration of their physical or mental health. The use of an online public communication service or digital medium is expressly addressed by the provision.
In everyday language, online harassment refers to harassment carried out through the internet or digital tools. It is often used in much the same way as “cyberbullying”.
However, everyday wording and legal classification are not the same. Depending on the facts, conduct may fall under moral harassment, sexual harassment, school bullying, threats, insult, defamation or other offences. A single post may be unlawful or criminal without, by itself, meeting the legal requirements for harassment.
A doxxing incident can trigger a cyberbullying campaign. The initial disclosure of personal information may be followed by hostile messages, threats, contact with a person's employer or relatives, or successive reposts by other accounts.
Conversely, someone can be cyberbullied without their personal information being published. Repeated insults, threats or rumours can amount to online harassment without doxxing.
Personal information is published once in circumstances that expose the person to a risk. This may be doxxing, without automatically establishing the repetition required for harassment.
A person receives repeated insults and threats across several platforms, but no personal information is disclosed.
A post exposes someone's identity or contact details, then several accounts target them with hostile messages or behaviour.
A single message can be serious and may constitute another offence, such as a threat, insult or defamation, without necessarily meeting the requirements for harassment.
There is no single legal classification covering every situation. Authorities consider the content, context, any legally relevant intent, the risk created, whether conduct was repeated and its impact on the victim.
The final legal classification is for the judicial authorities to determine. Several offences may apply to the same events, or the facts may fail to meet the requirements of a particular offence while remaining harmful and reportable.
For practical guidance, see Victim of doxxing: what should you do?, Reporting harmful online content and the legal framework in France.
This page provides general information about French concepts and law. It is not individual legal advice. Legal classifications and remedies depend on the facts and circumstances.